DAM/MAM asset management solutions for animation |
posted by Mathew Sherman on Oct. 9, 2015, 10:13 a.m. (4 days ago) |
| Anyone out there in a large animation/design company working in video and using an Asset Management System (DAM/MAM) to manage assets? Or are people still working of local storage or central server using simple shared folders? We're looking at adopting a MAM but most of them seem to lend themselves more to the print (Illustrator, InDesign, Photoshop) world. When you start asking about managing animation projects in C4D, AfterEffects the conversation always gets awkward. Anyone care to post their workflow for managing their collective assets when working in a shared environment? Mathew. | |
|
Thread Tags: workflow management, asset dam, mam, |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 1 Comments |
|
|
| Anyone out there in a large animation/design company working in video and using an Asset Management System (DAM/MAM) to manage assets? Or are people still working of local storage or central server using simple shared folders? We're looking at adopting a MAM but most of them seem to lend themselves more to the print (Illustrator, InDesign, Photoshop) world. When you start asking about managing animation projects in C4D, AfterEffects the conversation always gets awkward. Anyone care to post their workflow for managing their collective assets when working in a shared environment? Mathew. | |
|
↧
↧
↧
↧
Storage Recomendations? |
posted by Hasiel Hassan Alvarez Zavala on Oct. 9, 2015, 11:40 a.m. (4 days ago) |
| Hi
Im in charge of the evaluation of a new storage for a studio that is in production for a full cg animation featurefilm... right now our storage is small and slow, and in a long term plan we also want a scalable solution acording to the future needs...
At the end, we are facing "Oracle ZFS 3" and "HP 3PAR"
Leaving asidethe costof each,at the technical level, which would yourecommend and why?
This are the specifications for each one:
3PAR HP 3PAR StoreServ 7200c 8 Disks 1.92TB 6G SAS 2.5in cMLC SSD
54 Disks 6TB 6G SAS 7.2K 3.5in NL HDD.
RAW Capacity: 302.4 TiB Useable Capacity: 189.3 TiB Estimated IOPS: 51347
ZFS 3
ZFS ZS3-2
One Controler with: - 512 GB RAM
- 4 SSD disk read acelerators of 1.6Tb
Dos Trais DE2-24P with a total of: - 48 disks 900GB @ 10K RPM 2.5 inch SAS-2 HDD
- 2 disk SSDwrite aceleratorsde 200GB
Dos Trais DE2-24C with a total of: - 48 disks de 4TB @ 7.2K RPM 3.5 inch SAS-2 HDD
- 2 disks SSD write acelerators of 200GB
RAW Capacity:227 TiB Useable Capacity: 186 TiB Estimated IOPS: 46177
For any feedback, Thanks in advanced!
| |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 4 Comments |
|
|
| Hi
Im in charge of the evaluation of a new storage for a studio that is in production for a full cg animation featurefilm... right now our storage is small and slow, and in a long term plan we also want a scalable solution acording to the future needs...
At the end, we are facing "Oracle ZFS 3" and "HP 3PAR"
Leaving asidethe costof each,at the technical level, which would yourecommend and why?
This are the specifications for each one:
3PAR HP 3PAR StoreServ 7200c 8 Disks 1.92TB 6G SAS 2.5in cMLC SSD
54 Disks 6TB 6G SAS 7.2K 3.5in NL HDD.
RAW Capacity: 302.4 TiB Useable Capacity: 189.3 TiB Estimated IOPS: 51347
ZFS 3
ZFS ZS3-2
One Controler with: - 512 GB RAM
- 4 SSD disk read acelerators of 1.6Tb
Dos Trais DE2-24P with a total of: - 48 disks 900GB @ 10K RPM 2.5 inch SAS-2 HDD
- 2 disk SSDwrite aceleratorsde 200GB
Dos Trais DE2-24C with a total of: - 48 disks de 4TB @ 7.2K RPM 3.5 inch SAS-2 HDD
- 2 disks SSD write acelerators of 200GB
RAW Capacity:227 TiB Useable Capacity: 186 TiB Estimated IOPS: 46177
For any feedback, Thanks in advanced!
| |
|
↧
October 9, 2015, 11:20 am
Mac Pro farm |
posted by Brian Krusic on Oct. 9, 2015, 2:20 p.m. (4 days ago) |
| The new larger units in back were given to us under NDA so every one please keep a secret.
They are the new Death Can ber servers. - Brian
A good day is when no one shows up... and you don't have to go anywhere." | |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
| The new larger units in back were given to us under NDA so every one please keep a secret.
They are the new Death Can ber servers. - Brian
A good day is when no one shows up... and you don't have to go anywhere." | |
|
↧
↧
October 11, 2015, 10:15 pm
IPAM |
posted by on Oct. 12, 2015, 1:15 a.m. (1 day ago) |
| What are you using to track/manage IPs? Anybody using an appliance to dish out dns/dhcp/tftp ala infoblox or bluecat?
thanks
| |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
| What are you using to track/manage IPs? Anybody using an appliance to dish out dns/dhcp/tftp ala infoblox or bluecat?
thanks
| |
|
↧
October 12, 2015, 2:55 am
Security Audit and Penetration Testing Company |
posted by on Oct. 12, 2015, 5:55 a.m. (1 day ago) |
|
Good Morning everyone,
can someone recommend a company which specializes in Audit /
Penetration Testing for Postproduction / VFX Studios?
I came across Bishop Fox (http://www.bishopfox.com/), which was the
company that tested Shotgun, and was wondering who else is out
there.
Cheers
Jatha
-- ///////////////////////////
///////////////////////////
////////////////////
JATHAVAN SRIRAM
HARVEST /DIGITAL
AGRICULTURE GMBH
The contents of this
email are confidential. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify us as soon as possible: you
should not copy, forward, disclose or use the contents.
Start may monitor outgoing and incoming mail for
business purposes. | |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
|
Good Morning everyone,
can someone recommend a company which specializes in Audit /
Penetration Testing for Postproduction / VFX Studios?
I came across Bishop Fox (http://www.bishopfox.com/), which was the
company that tested Shotgun, and was wondering who else is out
there.
Cheers
Jatha
-- ///////////////////////////
///////////////////////////
////////////////////
JATHAVAN SRIRAM
HARVEST /DIGITAL
AGRICULTURE GMBH
The contents of this
email are confidential. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify us as soon as possible: you
should not copy, forward, disclose or use the contents.
Start may monitor outgoing and incoming mail for
business purposes. | |
|
↧
October 12, 2015, 3:05 am
Security Audit and Penetration Testing Company |
posted by on Oct. 12, 2015, 6:05 a.m. (1 day ago) |
| Hi,
Im aware of a dutch company called FOX IT,
https://www.fox-it.com/en/
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind Regards,
Harm van Houten | IT Architect
T | 035-7733278 | M | 06-51433378 | F | 035-7733107 |
harm.vanhouten@united4all.nl www.united4all.nl
Het Muziekpaviljoen (gebouw 1) | Sumatralaan 45 | 1217
GP Hilversum | Nederland Any agreement with United B.V. or any of its subsidiaries is always subject to its General Conditions, which have been filed with the Chamber of Commerce Gooi-, Eem-
and Flevoland under number 32063228. Any liability shall be limited according to these General Conditions. Seewww.united4all.nl/voorwaarden
for review and downloading of these General Conditions. They will also be forwarded upon first request.
From: studiosysadmins-discuss-bounces@studiosysadmins.com
[mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-bounces@studiosysadmins.com] On Behalf Of
Jathavan Sriram | Harvest Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:54 AM To: studiosysadmins-discuss@studiosysadmins.com Subject: [SSA-Discuss] Security Audit and Penetration Testing Company Good Morning everyone,
can someone recommend a company which specializes in Audit / Penetration Testing for Postproduction / VFX Studios?
I came across Bishop Fox (http://www.bishopfox.com/), which was the company that tested Shotgun, and was wondering who else is out there.
Cheers
Jatha
-- ///////////////////////////
///////////////////////////
//////////////////// JATHAVAN SRIRAM
HARVEST / DIGITAL AGRICULTURE GMBH The contents of this email are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us as soon as possible: you should not
copy, forward, disclose or use the contents. Start may monitor outgoing and incoming mail for business purposes. | |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
| Hi,
Im aware of a dutch company called FOX IT,
https://www.fox-it.com/en/
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind Regards,
Harm van Houten | IT Architect
T | 035-7733278 | M | 06-51433378 | F | 035-7733107 |
harm.vanhouten@united4all.nl www.united4all.nl
Het Muziekpaviljoen (gebouw 1) | Sumatralaan 45 | 1217
GP Hilversum | Nederland Any agreement with United B.V. or any of its subsidiaries is always subject to its General Conditions, which have been filed with the Chamber of Commerce Gooi-, Eem-
and Flevoland under number 32063228. Any liability shall be limited according to these General Conditions. Seewww.united4all.nl/voorwaarden
for review and downloading of these General Conditions. They will also be forwarded upon first request.
From: studiosysadmins-discuss-bounces@studiosysadmins.com
[mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-bounces@studiosysadmins.com] On Behalf Of
Jathavan Sriram | Harvest Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:54 AM To: studiosysadmins-discuss@studiosysadmins.com Subject: [SSA-Discuss] Security Audit and Penetration Testing Company Good Morning everyone,
can someone recommend a company which specializes in Audit / Penetration Testing for Postproduction / VFX Studios?
I came across Bishop Fox (http://www.bishopfox.com/), which was the company that tested Shotgun, and was wondering who else is out there.
Cheers
Jatha
-- ///////////////////////////
///////////////////////////
//////////////////// JATHAVAN SRIRAM
HARVEST / DIGITAL AGRICULTURE GMBH The contents of this email are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us as soon as possible: you should not
copy, forward, disclose or use the contents. Start may monitor outgoing and incoming mail for business purposes. | |
|
↧
October 13, 2015, 9:58 am
↧
↧
October 14, 2015, 6:50 am
License Server reporting tools? |
posted by Doug Meyer on Oct. 14, 2015, 9:50 a.m. (1 day ago) |
| What is everyone using for license usage reporting?
I'm looking for something that can monitor a number if different flexlm and RLM's etc and give a central place to monitor usage rates etc.
Doug
| |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 1 Comments |
|
|
| What is everyone using for license usage reporting?
I'm looking for something that can monitor a number if different flexlm and RLM's etc and give a central place to monitor usage rates etc.
Doug
| |
|
↧
October 14, 2015, 2:50 pm
27" Stereo Monitor - recommendations |
posted by on Oct. 14, 2015, 5:50 p.m. (1 day ago) |
| Folks, Just wanted to suss out any thoughts and experiences you may have with 27” stereo monitors. We are going to look at replacing the very aged fleet of Alienware monitors we have here. The task only just came up so I haven’t had much breathing
space to start looking around, but was just hoping to build up a list from you guys to see what may be good to look into or what is something to definitely steer away from. Cheers --
Steven Lees-Smith
Support Engineering Supervisor
T: +61 2 9383 4800 (main)
T: +61 2 8310 3505 (direct)
F: +61 2 9383 4801 (fax)
www.animallogic.com
Please think of the environment before printing this email. This email and any attachments may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient
of this email, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete this document if you have received it in error. We do not guarantee this email is error or virus free. | |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
| Folks, Just wanted to suss out any thoughts and experiences you may have with 27” stereo monitors. We are going to look at replacing the very aged fleet of Alienware monitors we have here. The task only just came up so I haven’t had much breathing
space to start looking around, but was just hoping to build up a list from you guys to see what may be good to look into or what is something to definitely steer away from. Cheers --
Steven Lees-Smith
Support Engineering Supervisor
T: +61 2 9383 4800 (main)
T: +61 2 8310 3505 (direct)
F: +61 2 9383 4801 (fax)
www.animallogic.com
Please think of the environment before printing this email. This email and any attachments may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient
of this email, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete this document if you have received it in error. We do not guarantee this email is error or virus free. | |
|
↧
October 17, 2015, 12:48 am
Swap size and tuning for 3D rendering on CentOS 6/7 |
posted by Fredrik Averpil on Oct. 17, 2015, 3:48 a.m. (1 day ago) |
| We have a mix of CentOS 6/7 render blades equipped with 64 GB of RAM. They have swap partition sizes ranging from 3-16 GB. What is the recommended swap partition size for a 3D render machine with 64 GB of RAM, would you say? They are also equipped with 128 GB SSD drives. Cheers, Fredrik | |
|
Thread Tags: linux,rendering,swap |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
| We have a mix of CentOS 6/7 render blades equipped with 64 GB of RAM. They have swap partition sizes ranging from 3-16 GB. What is the recommended swap partition size for a 3D render machine with 64 GB of RAM, would you say? They are also equipped with 128 GB SSD drives. Cheers, Fredrik | |
|
↧
October 17, 2015, 4:50 am
Swap size and tuning for 3D rendering on CentOS
6/7 |
posted by Jez Tucker on Oct. 17, 2015, 7:50 a.m. (1 day ago) |
| Zero.
If you're swapping, you need more RAMor to optimise your scenes. I.E. if you're in swap, you're not rendering efficientlybut spending time moving pages in and out of swap.
That said, it never hurts to have some swap allocated just in case something goes awry. The old adage used to be be 1.5 - 2x RAM. Though you may wish to play with thevm.swappiness etc.setting as appropriate.
Useful links :
Best,
Jez
On Saturday, 17 October 2015, Fredrik Averpil < content@studiosysadmins.com> wrote: | We have a mix of CentOS 6/7 render blades equipped with 64 GB of RAM. They have swap partition sizes ranging from 3-16 GB. What is the recommended swap partition size for a 3D render machine with 64 GB of RAM, would you say? They are also equipped with 128 GB SSD drives. Cheers, Fredrik | |
|
This email is confidential in that it is intended for the exclusive attention of the addressee(s) indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, this email should not be read or disclosed to any other person. Please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your computer system. Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the company from which this email was sent and, whilst to the best of our knowledge no viruses or defects exist, no responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage arising from its receipt or subsequent use of this email. | |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
| Zero.
If you're swapping, you need more RAMor to optimise your scenes. I.E. if you're in swap, you're not rendering efficientlybut spending time moving pages in and out of swap.
That said, it never hurts to have some swap allocated just in case something goes awry. The old adage used to be be 1.5 - 2x RAM. Though you may wish to play with thevm.swappiness etc.setting as appropriate.
Useful links :
Best,
Jez
On Saturday, 17 October 2015, Fredrik Averpil < content@studiosysadmins.com> wrote: | We have a mix of CentOS 6/7 render blades equipped with 64 GB of RAM. They have swap partition sizes ranging from 3-16 GB. What is the recommended swap partition size for a 3D render machine with 64 GB of RAM, would you say? They are also equipped with 128 GB SSD drives. Cheers, Fredrik | |
|
This email is confidential in that it is intended for the exclusive attention of the addressee(s) indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, this email should not be read or disclosed to any other person. Please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your computer system. Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the company from which this email was sent and, whilst to the best of our knowledge no viruses or defects exist, no responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage arising from its receipt or subsequent use of this email. | |
|
↧
↧
October 18, 2015, 2:15 pm
Swap size and tuning for 3D rendering on
CentOS 6/7 |
posted by David Leach on Oct. 18, 2015, 5:15 p.m. (1 day ago) |
| +1 for tiny swap.
I'd (personally) go for however much ram is used on an idle machine. If a render goes over a little bit then theoretically something that's not all that important will move into swap. If you've pushed so hard the render needs pages that are in swap something
needs to change/ be oomed.
From: studiosysadmins-discuss-bounces@studiosysadmins.com <studiosysadmins-discuss-bounces@studiosysadmins.com> on behalf of Saker Klippsten <sakerk@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, 18 October 2015 2:55 a.m. To: studiosysadmins-discuss@studiosysadmins.com Subject: Re: [SSA-Discuss] Swap size and tuning for 3D rendering on CentOS 6/7 +1
Zero.
If you're swapping, you need more RAM or to optimise your scenes. I.E. if you're in swap, you're not rendering efficiently but spending time moving pages in and out of swap.
That said, it never hurts to have some swap allocated just in case something goes awry. The old adage used to be be 1.5 - 2x RAM. Though you may wish to play with the vm.swappiness etc. setting as appropriate.
Useful links :
Best,
Jez
On Saturday, 17 October 2015, Fredrik Averpil < content@studiosysadmins.com> wrote: | We have a mix of CentOS 6/7 render blades equipped with 64 GB of RAM. They have swap partition sizes ranging from 3-16 GB. What is the recommended swap partition size for a 3D render machine with 64 GB of RAM, would you say? They are also equipped with 128 GB SSD drives. Cheers, Fredrik | |
|
This email is confidential in that it is intended for the exclusive attention of the addressee(s) indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, this email should not be read or disclosed to any other person. Please notify the sender immediately and
delete this email from your computer system. Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the company from which this email was sent and, whilst to the best of our knowledge no viruses or defects exist, no responsibility can be accepted for any loss
or damage arising from its receipt or subsequent use of this email.
| |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
| +1 for tiny swap.
I'd (personally) go for however much ram is used on an idle machine. If a render goes over a little bit then theoretically something that's not all that important will move into swap. If you've pushed so hard the render needs pages that are in swap something
needs to change/ be oomed.
From: studiosysadmins-discuss-bounces@studiosysadmins.com <studiosysadmins-discuss-bounces@studiosysadmins.com> on behalf of Saker Klippsten <sakerk@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, 18 October 2015 2:55 a.m. To: studiosysadmins-discuss@studiosysadmins.com Subject: Re: [SSA-Discuss] Swap size and tuning for 3D rendering on CentOS 6/7 +1
Zero.
If you're swapping, you need more RAM or to optimise your scenes. I.E. if you're in swap, you're not rendering efficiently but spending time moving pages in and out of swap.
That said, it never hurts to have some swap allocated just in case something goes awry. The old adage used to be be 1.5 - 2x RAM. Though you may wish to play with the vm.swappiness etc. setting as appropriate.
Useful links :
Best,
Jez
On Saturday, 17 October 2015, Fredrik Averpil < content@studiosysadmins.com> wrote: | We have a mix of CentOS 6/7 render blades equipped with 64 GB of RAM. They have swap partition sizes ranging from 3-16 GB. What is the recommended swap partition size for a 3D render machine with 64 GB of RAM, would you say? They are also equipped with 128 GB SSD drives. Cheers, Fredrik | |
|
This email is confidential in that it is intended for the exclusive attention of the addressee(s) indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, this email should not be read or disclosed to any other person. Please notify the sender immediately and
delete this email from your computer system. Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the company from which this email was sent and, whilst to the best of our knowledge no viruses or defects exist, no responsibility can be accepted for any loss
or damage arising from its receipt or subsequent use of this email.
| |
|
↧
October 18, 2015, 7:45 pm
|
| We're a small shop >50 artists so having nfs mounted software seems overkill. I plan to install maya, nuke etc locally on our cent6 boxes with SSDs. Maybe even keep homedirs local too but I'm still debating on it.
For those that are installing DCC tools locally on your Linux boxes, how do you take care of having multiple versions installed? Do you backup your workstations?
-gab
To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe
| |
|
↧
October 19, 2015, 9:45 am
ZFS CPU usage planning |
posted by Ali Poursamadi on Oct. 19, 2015, 12:45 p.m. (1 day ago) |
| Hello ZFS gurus out there, I'm doing some experiments with freenas and ZFS. The server is a dual processor, 6 core Xeon X5650 running at 2.67, 12 cores ( 24 threads ), 96G of ram. My ZFS pool consists of 3 RaidZs (4+1 Drives), no atime, no deduplication, gzip ( fastests ) compression. When I'm writing data to it over 10G, NFS, CPU usage goes up to 85%-90% and the copy maxes out at 300-400 MB/s. the kernel is using most of the CPU, interrupts are taking about 20% of one of the threads, nfsd is taking about 5-10% of one of the threads.
Questions: Is it normal CPU usage for processing ~350MB/s of throughput /3 RaidZs/gzip compression ? what do you suggest I look into to explore this problem ?
Best Ali
| |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
| Hello ZFS gurus out there, I'm doing some experiments with freenas and ZFS. The server is a dual processor, 6 core Xeon X5650 running at 2.67, 12 cores ( 24 threads ), 96G of ram. My ZFS pool consists of 3 RaidZs (4+1 Drives), no atime, no deduplication, gzip ( fastests ) compression. When I'm writing data to it over 10G, NFS, CPU usage goes up to 85%-90% and the copy maxes out at 300-400 MB/s. the kernel is using most of the CPU, interrupts are taking about 20% of one of the threads, nfsd is taking about 5-10% of one of the threads.
Questions: Is it normal CPU usage for processing ~350MB/s of throughput /3 RaidZs/gzip compression ? what do you suggest I look into to explore this problem ?
Best Ali
| |
|
↧
October 19, 2015, 3:35 pm
|
| Swap will give you a little breathing room to swap out unnecessary
processes that might be lying around during rendering, or ram for
tools that are infrequently used (such as a stowed web browser
someone left open on a render node desktop or a firefox
plugin-container that started sucking up ram because some flash
advertisement decided to stream a 15 minute ad during a long render)
A good reason to leave desktops off, but this kinda thing can happen
with non-desktop bg daemons too.
IIRC, on macs swap is dynamically assigned on demand as needed;
new files will appear in /var/vm as pressure on ram increases.
Best to leave that stuff alone, I'd think, and just purge them
once in a while if too many accumulate. Or perhaps there's some
cap you can enforce to prevent those from getting too numerous.
To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe
| |
|
↧
↧
October 19, 2015, 7:25 pm
Qube scalability |
posted by Samuel Nair on Oct. 19, 2015, 10:25 p.m. (1 day ago) |
| Wanted to find out if anyone had experience running Qube at scale of 500+ render nodes (maybe up to 1000).
We have a small render farm (200+) at the moment, but are going to be undergoing a sizeable growth in our farm size over the course of the next few months. One of the biggest concerns i have is in regard to Qube and its ability to handle that scale.
We have had a few Qube outages in the past where it looked like the qube workers were effectively DDOS'ing the Mysql DB and it required a complete shutdown of all workers and server and then a gradual restart.
PipelineFX support recommends adding SSD's for mysql and ensuring that there are enough cores for the service. Which is valid, but i am not convinced that will be good enough.
Anyone has any stories from the trenches about using Qube and how it handled scale ?. Also Tractor is looking increasingly attractive as an option.
-sam | |
|
Thread Tags: discuss-at-studiosysadmins |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
| Wanted to find out if anyone had experience running Qube at scale of 500+ render nodes (maybe up to 1000).
We have a small render farm (200+) at the moment, but are going to be undergoing a sizeable growth in our farm size over the course of the next few months. One of the biggest concerns i have is in regard to Qube and its ability to handle that scale.
We have had a few Qube outages in the past where it looked like the qube workers were effectively DDOS'ing the Mysql DB and it required a complete shutdown of all workers and server and then a gradual restart.
PipelineFX support recommends adding SSD's for mysql and ensuring that there are enough cores for the service. Which is valid, but i am not convinced that will be good enough.
Anyone has any stories from the trenches about using Qube and how it handled scale ?. Also Tractor is looking increasingly attractive as an option.
-sam | |
|
↧
October 20, 2015, 1:25 am
|
|
Looking to spec out or storage, Any recommendations for Isilon VAR in LA? Please feel free to contact me offline if prefered. Thanks!
-gab
To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe
| |
|
↧
October 21, 2015, 2:21 am
Hello! |
posted by Doug on Oct. 21, 2015, 5:21 a.m. |
| Just signed up and wanted to say hello, "Hello!". Just started up a new company in London, UK providing private cloud rendering solutions and this looks like a natural habitat for the likes of me. Do SSA hold many events in London similar to the one held in August this yesr? | |
|
Thread Tags: social |
0 Responses | | 0 Plus One's | | 0 Comments |
|
|
| Just signed up and wanted to say hello, "Hello!". Just started up a new company in London, UK providing private cloud rendering solutions and this looks like a natural habitat for the likes of me. Do SSA hold many events in London similar to the one held in August this yesr? | |
|
↧