Quantcast
Channel: StudioSysAdmins Message Board
Viewing all 3749 articles
Browse latest View live

Recommendations for fireproof cabinets (LTO storage)

$
0
0
Recommendations for fireproof cabinets (LTO storage)
posted by Bill Heiden on Nov. 29, 2017, 6:50 p.m.

Hi all,

 I have ~2600 LTO 3 tapes that need to be stored in fireproof cabinets.  Any recommended vendors?  Eventually these tapes will be migrated to LTO 7, but for the time being I need to find cabinets to store them.  Thanks in advance.

Thread Tags:
  fireproof lto cabinet 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 

Hi all,

 I have ~2600 LTO 3 tapes that need to be stored in fireproof cabinets.  Any recommended vendors?  Eventually these tapes will be migrated to LTO 7, but for the time being I need to find cabinets to store them.  Thanks in advance.


Recommendations for fireproof cabinets (LTO storage)

$
0
0
Recommendations for fireproof cabinets (LTO storage)
posted by Saker Klippsten on Nov. 29, 2017, 7:10 p.m.
What rating? most only last 2 hours.. which in my mind does not do much at all..

So you need to pray that
1. The fire is small. and not hot.
2. FireDept can put it out in time.
3. You can get there before the fire is out of control.
4. The FireDept will let you in there..
5. You can actually pickup and move 2600 tape while shits hitting the fan.


You need 7 of these suckers at 6k each..


or 3 of these at 10k each


You are better off making a duplicate copy to tape or to a nas box and renting a storage unit down the street ( which is all concrete block ) and sticking the OG tapes in there..
keep the nas onsite.

-S








On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Bill Heiden <content@studiosysadmins.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I have ~2600 LTO 3 tapes that need to be stored in fireproof cabinets. Any recommended vendors? Eventually these tapes will be migrated to LTO 7, but for the time being I need to find cabinets to store them. Thanks in advance.


To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe

Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
What rating? most only last 2 hours.. which in my mind does not do much at all..

So you need to pray that
1. The fire is small. and not hot.
2. FireDept can put it out in time.
3. You can get there before the fire is out of control.
4. The FireDept will let you in there..
5. You can actually pickup and move 2600 tape while shits hitting the fan.


You need 7 of these suckers at 6k each..


or 3 of these at 10k each


You are better off making a duplicate copy to tape or to a nas box and renting a storage unit down the street ( which is all concrete block ) and sticking the OG tapes in there..
keep the nas onsite.

-S








On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Bill Heiden <content@studiosysadmins.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I have ~2600 LTO 3 tapes that need to be stored in fireproof cabinets. Any recommended vendors? Eventually these tapes will be migrated to LTO 7, but for the time being I need to find cabinets to store them. Thanks in advance.


To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe

Recommendations for fireproof cabinets (LTO storage)

$
0
0
Recommendations for fireproof cabinets (LTO storage)
posted by Todd Smith on Nov. 29, 2017, 9:30 p.m. (1 day ago)
I agree with Saker, store a duplicate onsite, and keep the original either with a data management facility (Iron Mountain etc.) and on a tight budget in a temperature controlled concrete storage place.  I priced out fireproof cabinets for tape before, large investment for little gain, even offsite managed solutions are cheaper than those cabinets.

2600 LTO3s though, that's a lot of data janitorial work.  We did all our DLT to LTO6 last year, was hellish and not even close to those numbers.

Todd Smith
Head of Information Technology

soho vfx 
40 Hanna Ave. Suite 403, Toronto, Ontario M6K 0C3


From: "Bill Heiden" <content@studiosysadmins.com>
To: "studiosysadmins-discuss" <studiosysadmins-discuss@studiosysadmins.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 6:50:39 PM
Subject: [SSA-Discuss] Recommendations for fireproof cabinets (LTO storage)

Hi all,

 I have ~2600 LTO 3 tapes that need to be stored in fireproof cabinets.  Any recommended vendors?  Eventually these tapes will be migrated to LTO 7, but for the time being I need to find cabinets to store them.  Thanks in advance.


To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe
Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
I agree with Saker, store a duplicate onsite, and keep the original either with a data management facility (Iron Mountain etc.) and on a tight budget in a temperature controlled concrete storage place.  I priced out fireproof cabinets for tape before, large investment for little gain, even offsite managed solutions are cheaper than those cabinets.

2600 LTO3s though, that's a lot of data janitorial work.  We did all our DLT to LTO6 last year, was hellish and not even close to those numbers.

Todd Smith
Head of Information Technology

soho vfx 
40 Hanna Ave. Suite 403, Toronto, Ontario M6K 0C3


From: "Bill Heiden" <content@studiosysadmins.com>
To: "studiosysadmins-discuss" <studiosysadmins-discuss@studiosysadmins.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 6:50:39 PM
Subject: [SSA-Discuss] Recommendations for fireproof cabinets (LTO storage)

Hi all,

 I have ~2600 LTO 3 tapes that need to be stored in fireproof cabinets.  Any recommended vendors?  Eventually these tapes will be migrated to LTO 7, but for the time being I need to find cabinets to store them.  Thanks in advance.


To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe

OSX Automount schema from Active Directory

$
0
0
OSX Automount schema from Active Directory
posted by Michal Mocnak on Nov. 30, 2017, 10:14 a.m.

Hi,
in our company, we are thinking about switching to Windows Server 2016
and Active Directory. Right now we run LDAP/Open Directory on an old
Mac mini with OS X Server Lion, which does not seem like a sustainable
scenario for the future. Client workstations are Windows, OS X and
Linux machines. The server acts as a directory service for domain
authentication, logins, as the local DNS server and most importantly
provides mountpoint information for workstations to automatically
connect to our company's storage (which is a Dell Isilon cluster).
And that is where we have run into problems integrating Active
Directory with OS X. Joining the domain, logging in etc. works out of
the box, but so far we haven't come with a way of providing OS X with
mount information through AD. In the current setup with LDAP, OS X
retrieves the mounts a and handles them with autofs, and we expect
there must be a way of providing this through AD in a similar fashion.
Documentation on this topic both by Apple and Microsoft is very
sparse. I have followed instructions on extending the AD schema (e.g.
"Modifying the Active Directory Schema to Support Mac Systems"
http://markmail.org/download.xqy?id=f63mqp53otkqmgwi&number=1) but
with no avail. All of these tutorials seem somewhat outdated as they
were written at times when extending the AD schema was apparently
necessary even for OS X clients to bind with AD – I have not found any
newer information on whether this approach is still supported in
today's OS X (currently we run OS X Sierra on our workstations).
So my question stands: how must I extend the AD schema in order to
provide OS X clients with mount information? Where does OS X's
directory service look for mounts in the AD tree?
Just to be clear, we are not worried about mounting home directories
(that should probably work but we don't need that at all).

Thread Tags:
  server windows server osx automount 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 

Hi,
in our company, we are thinking about switching to Windows Server 2016
and Active Directory. Right now we run LDAP/Open Directory on an old
Mac mini with OS X Server Lion, which does not seem like a sustainable
scenario for the future. Client workstations are Windows, OS X and
Linux machines. The server acts as a directory service for domain
authentication, logins, as the local DNS server and most importantly
provides mountpoint information for workstations to automatically
connect to our company's storage (which is a Dell Isilon cluster).
And that is where we have run into problems integrating Active
Directory with OS X. Joining the domain, logging in etc. works out of
the box, but so far we haven't come with a way of providing OS X with
mount information through AD. In the current setup with LDAP, OS X
retrieves the mounts a and handles them with autofs, and we expect
there must be a way of providing this through AD in a similar fashion.
Documentation on this topic both by Apple and Microsoft is very
sparse. I have followed instructions on extending the AD schema (e.g.
"Modifying the Active Directory Schema to Support Mac Systems"
http://markmail.org/download.xqy?id=f63mqp53otkqmgwi&number=1) but
with no avail. All of these tutorials seem somewhat outdated as they
were written at times when extending the AD schema was apparently
necessary even for OS X clients to bind with AD – I have not found any
newer information on whether this approach is still supported in
today's OS X (currently we run OS X Sierra on our workstations).
So my question stands: how must I extend the AD schema in order to
provide OS X clients with mount information? Where does OS X's
directory service look for mounts in the AD tree?
Just to be clear, we are not worried about mounting home directories
(that should probably work but we don't need that at all).

VMware Horizon View for VDI/PCoIP workstations

$
0
0
VMware Horizon View for VDI/PCoIP workstations
posted by Julian Firminger on Nov. 30, 2017, 11 a.m.
As promised, reporting back regarding using VMware Horizon View and nVidia GRID for delivering remote workstations.

What can I say, it works extremely well and considering I have editors confident to use it for mid-range production work at 50fps (not just offline), I reckon theres a good chance it will work well for VFX.

Before you all get too excited, the platform we have up is fairly narrow in its implementation. So YMMV. Were exclusively testing Win10 VMs supporting Avid MediaComposer.

Test Host:
HPE DL380Gen10/2x28c/768G/5x480GB-RI-SSD-raid6/4x10G
1xTeslaM60 (Big shout out to the peeps at Escape for renting us one so fast)
ESXi v6.0u3

VMWare Horizon View 7.3
Security Server
Connection Server
Composer
vCenter
GRID vGPU ESXi host driver
MediaComposer 8.9.2 VM edition on Win10ent VMs
nVidia GRID driver
Nexis 7.9
Interplay 3.4

HP t630 Thin Clients.

Dual Screen 1920x1080 fully featured Avid Media Composer will run over PCoIP native protocol consuming 8-14Mbps. The OS and app UI (mouse/key and Wacom) are imperceptible to actual hardware. Video playback in S/R mode (~quarter screen) is good to excellent. Full-screen playback at 50fps drops frames. At 25fps seems ok.

Note that this is test #1 using native PCoIP, not the supposedly much groovier VMware Blast Extreme protocol. (this has audio dropout issues currently but weve not spent much time trying to work that out.) Blast should, at least it says so on the tin, support 60fps. I've no reason to doubt that either, the cursory tests we did appear to do this, but it has other issues that I cannot resolve yet.

Using homogenous grid_M60-1q vGPUs it looks like we can run 16 VMs on a host. Though testing for that will commence in two weeks when we build out to the production host. For now Im stuck with a max of 4 due to PSU/Heat restrictions. 4 VMs run concurrently without issue and actually outperform the equivalent 4 x z440 workstations on most import/export/transcode/conform/render operations. We have seen some weirdness with real-time effects all running concurrently, and multicam is an issue (though we think not entirely related to the VMs, more network)

Its an impressive system and will scale very well. View itself is meant to be multi-site/multi-domain and has integral to it a bunch of features youd probably end up building manually if you used something else. Like its own Client>tunnel>DMZ>internal topology. Literally every component is designed with security, HA and scaling in mind.

Its also bombastically expensive at a small scale and complicated to deploy. For low-midrange workstation replacements this appears, at least for now, as a completely viable solution if you have both the scale-economics and skills on staff to justify it.

Julian Firminger

Senior Systems Administrator
United Broadcast Facilities
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
As promised, reporting back regarding using VMware Horizon View and nVidia GRID for delivering remote workstations.

What can I say, it works extremely well and considering I have editors confident to use it for mid-range production work at 50fps (not just offline), I reckon theres a good chance it will work well for VFX.

Before you all get too excited, the platform we have up is fairly narrow in its implementation. So YMMV. Were exclusively testing Win10 VMs supporting Avid MediaComposer.

Test Host:
HPE DL380Gen10/2x28c/768G/5x480GB-RI-SSD-raid6/4x10G
1xTeslaM60 (Big shout out to the peeps at Escape for renting us one so fast)
ESXi v6.0u3

VMWare Horizon View 7.3
Security Server
Connection Server
Composer
vCenter
GRID vGPU ESXi host driver
MediaComposer 8.9.2 VM edition on Win10ent VMs
nVidia GRID driver
Nexis 7.9
Interplay 3.4

HP t630 Thin Clients.

Dual Screen 1920x1080 fully featured Avid Media Composer will run over PCoIP native protocol consuming 8-14Mbps. The OS and app UI (mouse/key and Wacom) are imperceptible to actual hardware. Video playback in S/R mode (~quarter screen) is good to excellent. Full-screen playback at 50fps drops frames. At 25fps seems ok.

Note that this is test #1 using native PCoIP, not the supposedly much groovier VMware Blast Extreme protocol. (this has audio dropout issues currently but weve not spent much time trying to work that out.) Blast should, at least it says so on the tin, support 60fps. I've no reason to doubt that either, the cursory tests we did appear to do this, but it has other issues that I cannot resolve yet.

Using homogenous grid_M60-1q vGPUs it looks like we can run 16 VMs on a host. Though testing for that will commence in two weeks when we build out to the production host. For now Im stuck with a max of 4 due to PSU/Heat restrictions. 4 VMs run concurrently without issue and actually outperform the equivalent 4 x z440 workstations on most import/export/transcode/conform/render operations. We have seen some weirdness with real-time effects all running concurrently, and multicam is an issue (though we think not entirely related to the VMs, more network)

Its an impressive system and will scale very well. View itself is meant to be multi-site/multi-domain and has integral to it a bunch of features youd probably end up building manually if you used something else. Like its own Client>tunnel>DMZ>internal topology. Literally every component is designed with security, HA and scaling in mind.

Its also bombastically expensive at a small scale and complicated to deploy. For low-midrange workstation replacements this appears, at least for now, as a completely viable solution if you have both the scale-economics and skills on staff to justify it.

Julian Firminger

Senior Systems Administrator
United Broadcast Facilities
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Holiday Party!

$
0
0
Holiday Party!
posted by anthonyhoit on Dec. 1, 2017, 2:51 p.m.

Thought some of you might want some holiday party action.

RFX Christmas Party!

---

Come join RFX, Autodesk, GenArts & The [RE]DESIGN Group for an evening of Christmas cheer.  Meet up with friends, eat great food, have a drink, network and catch the latest with Flame, Maya, Arnold, Sapphire & Shotgun.

Raffles & Prizes!

Come for the tasty food, drinks & bring your Christmas Cheer!

---

https://www.rfx.com/event/rfx-mas-party-technology-event-12-7-17/265

 

Happy Holidays!

-Anthony

Thread Tags:
  social 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 

Thought some of you might want some holiday party action.

RFX Christmas Party!

---

Come join RFX, Autodesk, GenArts & The [RE]DESIGN Group for an evening of Christmas cheer.  Meet up with friends, eat great food, have a drink, network and catch the latest with Flame, Maya, Arnold, Sapphire & Shotgun.

Raffles & Prizes!

Come for the tasty food, drinks & bring your Christmas Cheer!

---

https://www.rfx.com/event/rfx-mas-party-technology-event-12-7-17/265

 

Happy Holidays!

-Anthony

Isilon Tips and Tricks Webinar / Dec 7th 11am PST

$
0
0
Isilon Tips and Tricks Webinar / Dec 7th 11am PST
posted by Brett Dellandre on Dec. 5, 2017, 3:24 p.m. (3 days ago)

Hello SSA,

I hope I am not breaking the forum rules here.

 

Dell EMC is hosting and Isilon Tips and Tricks Webinar on Dec 7th at 11am PST.

 

Register here: https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/13935/291795/tips-and-tricks-to-rock-your-isilon-world

 

 

Details:

Join us on December 7th at 11am PT / 2pm ET to learn our top tips and tricks for getting the most out of your Isilon implementation. Based on working with customers around the world, our Isilon technical experts will share insights and best practices across configuration, operation and management of Isilon environments. Time will also be allocated to a live ‘Ask-The-Expert’ session, so be sure to bring your specific questions and learn from your peer’ questions.

Presented by

Rash Vyas, Phil Lam, and Scott Owens

 

The webinar will play during the following time:

North America: Thursday, December 7th at 11:00 a.m. PST / 2:00 p.m. EST

Thread Tags:
  Isilon 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   1 Comments  
 

Hello SSA,

I hope I am not breaking the forum rules here.

 

Dell EMC is hosting and Isilon Tips and Tricks Webinar on Dec 7th at 11am PST.

 

Register here: https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/13935/291795/tips-and-tricks-to-rock-your-isilon-world

 

 

Details:

Join us on December 7th at 11am PT / 2pm ET to learn our top tips and tricks for getting the most out of your Isilon implementation. Based on working with customers around the world, our Isilon technical experts will share insights and best practices across configuration, operation and management of Isilon environments. Time will also be allocated to a live ‘Ask-The-Expert’ session, so be sure to bring your specific questions and learn from your peer’ questions.

Presented by

Rash Vyas, Phil Lam, and Scott Owens

 

The webinar will play during the following time:

North America: Thursday, December 7th at 11:00 a.m. PST / 2:00 p.m. EST

RV - video starts playing super fast and no audio

$
0
0
RV - video starts playing super fast and no audio
posted by Greg Whynott on Dec. 5, 2017, 4:25 p.m. (3 days ago)

We are seeing periodically instances where media being played back in RV from a playlist will start playing at fast forward speeds and without audio on its own.

I've been told that while this is happening, changing the audio rate preferences, mute / un mute or anything will fix the issue.


Anyone having or heard of similar issues?


CentOS 7.2 and 3, with pulseaudio, RV 7.2.1.


danke!
-greg



Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   2 Comments  
 

We are seeing periodically instances where media being played back in RV from a playlist will start playing at fast forward speeds and without audio on its own.

I've been told that while this is happening, changing the audio rate preferences, mute / un mute or anything will fix the issue.


Anyone having or heard of similar issues?


CentOS 7.2 and 3, with pulseaudio, RV 7.2.1.


danke!
-greg




Remember FinderRefresh? There's more....

$
0
0
Remember FinderRefresh? There's more....
posted by Dan Young on Dec. 7, 2017, 1:45 p.m. (1 day ago)
Hey y'all, a little pump for Matt Timmons (matt.timmons@icloud.com) - a list member from TX - he had previously made us a Finder Refresh tool that is now named "Window Refresh" - and it's got a sister tool now for relative link building.

They're cheap and cheerful tools, check 'em out below!

https://productionworkflow.solutions/

Saved my bacon enough times with a wide-spread of NFS vs. Mac Finder issues, it's a worthwhile tool for 5$.

Best,
DY
Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
Hey y'all, a little pump for Matt Timmons (matt.timmons@icloud.com) - a list member from TX - he had previously made us a Finder Refresh tool that is now named "Window Refresh" - and it's got a sister tool now for relative link building.

They're cheap and cheerful tools, check 'em out below!

https://productionworkflow.solutions/

Saved my bacon enough times with a wide-spread of NFS vs. Mac Finder issues, it's a worthwhile tool for 5$.

Best,
DY

Adobe PP MAM systems

$
0
0
Adobe PP MAM systems
posted by Julian Firminger on Dec. 12, 2017, 8:25 a.m. (1 day ago)
Listwarriors:

We're looking to deploy a large scale MAM for Premiere workflow's. By large scale I mean comparable to Interplay on the whole (or nearly whole) feature set. (I.e. not the storage-centric MAM systems like EditShare and nothing as small as Metus).

Is anyone else out there doing end to end workflow and asset management for collaborative workflows for Premiere? If so what are you using to do it?

We're considering both Dalet and Sony Hive so far if anyone has experience / thoughts on these too.

Julian Firminger

Senior Systems Administrator
United Broadcast Facilities
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
Listwarriors:

We're looking to deploy a large scale MAM for Premiere workflow's. By large scale I mean comparable to Interplay on the whole (or nearly whole) feature set. (I.e. not the storage-centric MAM systems like EditShare and nothing as small as Metus).

Is anyone else out there doing end to end workflow and asset management for collaborative workflows for Premiere? If so what are you using to do it?

We're considering both Dalet and Sony Hive so far if anyone has experience / thoughts on these too.

Julian Firminger

Senior Systems Administrator
United Broadcast Facilities
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Moving to CentOS 7

$
0
0
Moving to CentOS 7
posted by Alfred Young on Dec. 12, 2017, 7:11 p.m. (1 day ago)

CentOS 6 is starting to feel really dated.

I'm considering moving my workstation to CentOS 7 while the rest of the network remains on 6.8, and becoming a guiena pig.

Can anyone point me to any material to help in a possible transition?

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thread Tags:
  linux 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 

CentOS 6 is starting to feel really dated.

I'm considering moving my workstation to CentOS 7 while the rest of the network remains on 6.8, and becoming a guiena pig.

Can anyone point me to any material to help in a possible transition?

Any help would be appreciated.

 

do you know where I can buy bulk amounts of GPUs?

$
0
0
do you know where I can buy bulk amounts of GPUs?
posted by Greg Whynott on Dec. 13, 2017, 2:50 p.m. (1 day ago)
I'm looking to buy a lot of GPUs in one purchase,

Considering a few potentials, it'll likely be one of the below:

@50 x Vega 54's

@150 x RX580

Does anyone know the best way to go about this? This will be a first for me so I've no idea how to go about it, and i'm sure GPUs are not the easiest thing to get in quantity these days.

thanks for your help,

greg



Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
I'm looking to buy a lot of GPUs in one purchase,

Considering a few potentials, it'll likely be one of the below:

@50 x Vega 54's

@150 x RX580

Does anyone know the best way to go about this? This will be a first for me so I've no idea how to go about it, and i'm sure GPUs are not the easiest thing to get in quantity these days.

thanks for your help,

greg



Anyone interested in a 2005 Panasonic Plasma

$
0
0
Anyone interested in a 2005 Panasonic Plasma
posted by Michael Stein on Dec. 15, 2017, 1:20 a.m.
Through a series of events, I've come back into possession of a Panasonic TH-42PX50U that I bought back in 2005. It was used regularly until 2009, and then for 7.5 years it said virtually unused and untouched by human hands at my in-laws. Its currently living with us in Hollywood, so would need to be picked up from there.

I did a quick test and it looks in good shape, although YMMV in a professional environment. Fun facts - its heavy (about 100 pounds), and it has more composite inputs than HDMI (2 vs. 1). I've had several people tell me that someone would want it, but no one seems to buying them in the places you'd think.

If this is something that has interest, hit me up offline and I'm sure we can arrange an amenable price. I'd love to see it go to a good home rather than the recycle yard.
Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
Through a series of events, I've come back into possession of a Panasonic TH-42PX50U that I bought back in 2005. It was used regularly until 2009, and then for 7.5 years it said virtually unused and untouched by human hands at my in-laws. Its currently living with us in Hollywood, so would need to be picked up from there.

I did a quick test and it looks in good shape, although YMMV in a professional environment. Fun facts - its heavy (about 100 pounds), and it has more composite inputs than HDMI (2 vs. 1). I've had several people tell me that someone would want it, but no one seems to buying them in the places you'd think.

If this is something that has interest, hit me up offline and I'm sure we can arrange an amenable price. I'd love to see it go to a good home rather than the recycle yard.

Anyone else feel like Dell has dropped off?

$
0
0
Anyone else feel like Dell has dropped off?
posted by Derrick MacPherson on Dec. 21, 2017, 3:40 p.m. (1 day ago)
It seems like Dell does not have the same respect and service for our industry as it once did, its totally different than it was up until a year or two ago.. What do you all think?


Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
It seems like Dell does not have the same respect and service for our industry as it once did, its totally different than it was up until a year or two ago.. What do you all think?


Fake GPUs from B&H and Amazon?

$
0
0
Fake GPUs from B&H and Amazon?
posted by James Cohen on Dec. 29, 2017, 12:21 a.m.

We needed to rush order a Quadro M6000 for Background Reactor on a Flame.

First we ordered one from B&H. When I pulled it from its shipping box I saw that the card said GTX 970 on the side... figured it was an honest mistake, and started a return. 

We still needed that card, so I placed a second order on Amazon (sold through "Professional Graphics Solutions"). Opened the Amazon box, and inside was a GPU shaped HP box that was shrink wrapped. Opened that box, and inside was lierally greasy NUTS, BOLTS, and a CASTER wrapped up in foam! Called up Amazon customer service, sent back the nuts and bolts, got our money back in a couple of days. No biggie.

Back to the B&H card. I looked at it a little closer, and I realized that part of the GTX 970 had been spray painted green to appear as if it was a Quadro M6000. I alerted B&H customer service to this, and shipped it back. A Customer Returns Supervisor at B&H emails me back and says that barcodes have been taken off a real Quadro M6000 and put on this card... and then essentially accuses me of the fraud and says they can't accept the return. After yelling at their customer service on the phone for a while, they remained firm. So I guess I'll try a credit card chargeback?

Has anyone seen anything like this before?

B&H got the fake Quadro M6000 from what appears to be HP's returns warehouse or something to that effect. There are some stickers on it that indicate its origin and history. My narrative is that someone ordered a Quadro M6000 (or got it bundled with a Z840), doctored up a GTX 970 to look like the more expensive card, initiated a return, got their money back and kept the M6000. Anyone have any idea how to contact this department at HP to do some detective work where the fraud occurred (upstream of B&H)? 

 

Thread Tags:
  GPU 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 

We needed to rush order a Quadro M6000 for Background Reactor on a Flame.

First we ordered one from B&H. When I pulled it from its shipping box I saw that the card said GTX 970 on the side... figured it was an honest mistake, and started a return. 

We still needed that card, so I placed a second order on Amazon (sold through "Professional Graphics Solutions"). Opened the Amazon box, and inside was a GPU shaped HP box that was shrink wrapped. Opened that box, and inside was lierally greasy NUTS, BOLTS, and a CASTER wrapped up in foam! Called up Amazon customer service, sent back the nuts and bolts, got our money back in a couple of days. No biggie.

Back to the B&H card. I looked at it a little closer, and I realized that part of the GTX 970 had been spray painted green to appear as if it was a Quadro M6000. I alerted B&H customer service to this, and shipped it back. A Customer Returns Supervisor at B&H emails me back and says that barcodes have been taken off a real Quadro M6000 and put on this card... and then essentially accuses me of the fraud and says they can't accept the return. After yelling at their customer service on the phone for a while, they remained firm. So I guess I'll try a credit card chargeback?

Has anyone seen anything like this before?

B&H got the fake Quadro M6000 from what appears to be HP's returns warehouse or something to that effect. There are some stickers on it that indicate its origin and history. My narrative is that someone ordered a Quadro M6000 (or got it bundled with a Z840), doctored up a GTX 970 to look like the more expensive card, initiated a return, got their money back and kept the M6000. Anyone have any idea how to contact this department at HP to do some detective work where the fraud occurred (upstream of B&H)? 

 


Friday funnies?

$
0
0
Friday funnies?
posted by Greg Whynott on Dec. 29, 2017, 11:10 a.m. (1 day ago)
I knew it wasn't a paranoid conspiracy theory!!


Sent from a slow iPhone.  

Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
I knew it wasn't a paranoid conspiracy theory!!


Sent from a slow iPhone.  

zfs record sizes for vfx work flows and other zfs optimisations

$
0
0
zfs record sizes for vfx work flows and other zfs optimisations
posted by Ben De Luca on Jan. 1, 2018, 7:20 p.m. (1 day ago)
Hi,
I wondered if any one had done the RND on record size for VFX workflows? I was looking at optimising one particular workflow with backups and virtual tapes and record size was hugely significant. I am guessing it will be for vfx work flows also, but wondered if any one had actually RND'd it.


Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
Hi,
I wondered if any one had done the RND on record size for VFX workflows? I was looking at optimising one particular workflow with backups and virtual tapes and record size was hugely significant. I am guessing it will be for vfx work flows also, but wondered if any one had actually RND'd it.


zfs record sizes for vfx work flows and other zfs optimisations

$
0
0
zfs record sizes for vfx work flows and other zfs optimisations
posted by Brian Krusic on Jan. 2, 2018, 1:40 p.m. (1 day ago)
Hi,

Ive had very good results with 1M record size and 1M NFS r/w size.

Well, I mean as good as it can be.  All in all nothing is ever really fast enough :)

- Brian

Every day is a gift
Thats why they call it the present"

On Jan 2, 2018, at 1:35 PM, greg whynott <greg.whynott@gmail.com> wrote:

default/choose..  words.  ;)

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Ben De Luca <bdeluca@gmail.com> wrote:
zfs doesnt choose, its set on the file system and defaults to 128k 

On 2 January 2018 at 17:24, greg whynott <greg.whynott@gmail.com> wrote:
No R&D but for what it is worth...

Do your own IO profile.  What you guys are doing in your shop may not be the same elsewhere and certainly not everyone is in the same boat or uses storage verbatim.  Best bet is to monitor for a period of time and build your shops own profile. 

It is also a good idea if possible to build FS's for different use cases.   Example,  a FS for your database servers might have a record size of 8k,  whereas a FS with big files on it (over 1 megabyte) may be set at 128k. 

My final thought would be in most cases with VFX related work,  you are dealing with big files,  a 128k record size may be the best bet, or let ZFS choose itself.

greg





On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Ben De Luca <bdeluca@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 
    I wondered if any one had done the RND on record size for VFX workflows? I was looking at optimising one particular workflow with backups and virtual tapes and record size was hugely significant. I am guessing it will be for vfx work flows also, but wondered if any one had actually RND'd it. 



To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe


To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe


To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe

To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe

Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
Hi,

Ive had very good results with 1M record size and 1M NFS r/w size.

Well, I mean as good as it can be.  All in all nothing is ever really fast enough :)

- Brian

Every day is a gift
Thats why they call it the present"

On Jan 2, 2018, at 1:35 PM, greg whynott <greg.whynott@gmail.com> wrote:

default/choose..  words.  ;)

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Ben De Luca <bdeluca@gmail.com> wrote:
zfs doesnt choose, its set on the file system and defaults to 128k 

On 2 January 2018 at 17:24, greg whynott <greg.whynott@gmail.com> wrote:
No R&D but for what it is worth...

Do your own IO profile.  What you guys are doing in your shop may not be the same elsewhere and certainly not everyone is in the same boat or uses storage verbatim.  Best bet is to monitor for a period of time and build your shops own profile. 

It is also a good idea if possible to build FS's for different use cases.   Example,  a FS for your database servers might have a record size of 8k,  whereas a FS with big files on it (over 1 megabyte) may be set at 128k. 

My final thought would be in most cases with VFX related work,  you are dealing with big files,  a 128k record size may be the best bet, or let ZFS choose itself.

greg





On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Ben De Luca <bdeluca@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 
    I wondered if any one had done the RND on record size for VFX workflows? I was looking at optimising one particular workflow with backups and virtual tapes and record size was hugely significant. I am guessing it will be for vfx work flows also, but wondered if any one had actually RND'd it. 



To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe


To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe


To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe

To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe

Intel CPU bug

Nvidia says no no no - to GeForce in the datacenter.

$
0
0
Nvidia says no no no - to GeForce in the datacenter.
posted by Saker Klippsten on Jan. 3, 2018, 2:15 a.m.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/03/nvidia_server_gpus/


Not sure what constitutes a datacenter? They do not explicitly define it under definitions. 

No Datacenter Deployment. The SOFTWARE is not licensed for datacenter deployment, except that blockchain processing in a datacenter is permitted.


Sent from my iPhone
Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/03/nvidia_server_gpus/


Not sure what constitutes a datacenter? They do not explicitly define it under definitions. 

No Datacenter Deployment. The SOFTWARE is not licensed for datacenter deployment, except that blockchain processing in a datacenter is permitted.


Sent from my iPhone
Viewing all 3749 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images