Quantcast
Channel: StudioSysAdmins Message Board
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3749

Burn poll, local rendering negating the need for a burn farm?

$
0
0
Burn poll, local rendering negating the need for a burn farm?
posted by Dan Young on Oct. 30, 2014, 6:05 p.m. (2 days ago)

I'll bite - lots of my clients are going this way and it's been working very well. Mostly dual 6000 or dual K6000. Check with the Desk if they can run reactor with 4000s, but I doubt it.

A second big GPU is about the cost of a mediocre burn node, and significantly faster round trip to the operator. Also, significant power savings not running mad pizza boxes.

I have never seen a single proc burn node but if it's got a good GPU I don't see why not, providing there is good connectivity to the machines.

I'd suggest stopping investment into burn nodes and have for almost a year now with great success. I'd be interested to hear arguments and cases to the contrary, though.

DY

On Oct 30, 2014 2:16 PM, "Brian Krusic" <brian@krusic.com> wrote:
Hi,

Im contemplating the use of an add in graphics card so that Flame can kick renders to it while continuing unabated. This would hopefully negate the need for a burn farm.

Has any one run tests of this nature, comparisons etc...?

Recently had a situation were we had to up our burn farm graphics from 3700 to older 4000 ($300 second hand market) due to its added t-ram.

While its working now, Im thinking to future proof the farm with even better 4200 but they are more $$$.

Also, has any run single proc CPU on there burn farm?

- Brian

Technologist...
i.e., Purveyor of the ironic"


To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe
Thread Tags:
  discuss-at-studiosysadmins 

0 Responses   0 Plus One's   0 Comments  
 

I'll bite - lots of my clients are going this way and it's been working very well. Mostly dual 6000 or dual K6000. Check with the Desk if they can run reactor with 4000s, but I doubt it.

A second big GPU is about the cost of a mediocre burn node, and significantly faster round trip to the operator. Also, significant power savings not running mad pizza boxes.

I have never seen a single proc burn node but if it's got a good GPU I don't see why not, providing there is good connectivity to the machines.

I'd suggest stopping investment into burn nodes and have for almost a year now with great success. I'd be interested to hear arguments and cases to the contrary, though.

DY

On Oct 30, 2014 2:16 PM, "Brian Krusic" <brian@krusic.com> wrote:
Hi,

Im contemplating the use of an add in graphics card so that Flame can kick renders to it while continuing unabated. This would hopefully negate the need for a burn farm.

Has any one run tests of this nature, comparisons etc...?

Recently had a situation were we had to up our burn farm graphics from 3700 to older 4000 ($300 second hand market) due to its added t-ram.

While its working now, Im thinking to future proof the farm with even better 4200 but they are more $$$.

Also, has any run single proc CPU on there burn farm?

- Brian

Technologist...
i.e., Purveyor of the ironic"


To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3749

Trending Articles