By Jonathan Solomon -
What about SSDs as the "system" or cache and/or metadata drives? We've
seen that on some of our storage systems where swapping out to SSD for the
metadata drives has resolved slow access times, which occasionally would
causes a client system crash.
On 2/24/13 2:47 AM, "studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com"
wrote:
>Message: 13
>Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:23:23 -0500
>From: greg whynott >To: "discuss@studiosysadmins.com" >Subject: Re: [SSA-Discuss] Changing MTU size on bluearc to support
> jumbo frames
>Message-ID:
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>just throwing this out there... adding another head is a serious amount
>of
>money to throw at the problem. you'll need single name space license and
>cluster license, it'll be a 6 figure ticket I'd think. and one head will
>still be servicing the load if the data is on its EVS,
>>a caching device, while still expensive, would probably be the best use
>of your money to address this, if you were to spend money. BA also had
>caching solutions but i'm not overly familiar with them, or if HDS still
>is offering them. I suspect they are...
>>-g
>>
To unsubscribe from the list send a blank e-mail to mailto:studiosysadmins-discuss-request@studiosysadmins.com?subject=unsubscribe
↧